We believe in education. We do not believe in the way it is delivered.
None of this is a criticism of teachers. A classroom of thirty has one voice, one board and one pace, and someone has to pitch to the middle. It is a criticism of a model built around economics rather than around children: one that serves the students it happens to fit, and quietly convinces everyone else that they are simply not academic. Five years of doing exactly what they were told, and the conclusion they draw is that the fault was theirs.
Two students can sit the same paper, in the same room, on the same morning, having been taught the same content, and walk out with entirely different grades. The gap is rarely ability. It is almost always the fit between how the material was delivered and how that particular student takes information in.